Ja 179 Satadhammajātaka
The Story about (the Proud Brahmin) Satadhamma (2s)
In the present many monks are found to be earning their living in a wrong way, throwing away their chance of true gains in the dispensation. The Buddha tells a story of a brahmin who took food from the Bodhisatta, who was an outcaste at the time, and could never forgive himself for it.
The Bodhisatta = the son of the outcaste (caṇḍālaputta),
Ānanda = the young brahmin (māṇava).
Keywords: Right livelihood, Suitability, Devas.
“What a trifle.”
At one time there were a great many monks who used to get a living by being physicians, or runners, doing errands on foot, exchanging alms for alms, The offence meant is giving a share of alms on one day, and receiving the like the next day, to save the trouble of seeking alms daily. and the like, the twenty-one unlawful callings. All this will be set forth in the Sāketajātaka [Ja 237]. [The Jātaka does not discuss the subject at hand. In Ja 469, the wrong ways are further described as follows: The monks gained their livelihood in the twenty-one unlawful ways; they associated with the nuns, and sons and daughters were born to them; monks forsook the duties of the Saṅgha, and nuns forsook the duties of nuns, lay brethren and sisters the duties of such, brahmins did no longer the duties of a brahmin: men for the most part followed the ten paths of evil-doing, and as they died thus filled the hosts of all states of suffering.] When the Teacher found out that they got their living thus, he said: “Now there are a great many monks who get their living in unlawful ways. Those who get their living thus will not escape birth as Yakkhas or Petas; they will become beasts of burden; they will be born in hell; for their benefit and blessing it is necessary to hold a discourse which bears its own moral clear and plain.”
So he summoned the Saṅgha together, and said: “Monks, you must not win your necessaries by the one-and-twenty unlawful methods. Food won unlawfully is like a piece of redhot iron, like a deadly poison. These unlawful methods are blamed and rebuked by disciples of all Buddhas and Paccekabuddhas. For those who eat food gained by unlawful means there is no laughter and no joy. Food got in this way, in my dispensation, is like the leavings of a Caṇḍāla. To partake of it, for a disciple of the Dhamma, is like partaking of the leavings of a Caṇḍāla.” And with these words, he told a story about the past.
In the past, when Brahmadatta was king of Benares, the Bodhisatta was born as the son of a man of the lowest caste. When he grew up, he took the road for some purpose, taking for his provision some rice grains in a basket.
At that time there was a young fellow in Benares, named Satadhamma. He was the son of a householder, a northern brahmin. He also took the road for some purpose, but neither rice grains nor basket had he. The two met upon the highway. Said the young brahmin to the other, “What caste are you of?” He replied, “Of the lowest. And what are you?”
All day they tramped along; and at evening they both had a bath in some nice water. When they came out, the Bodhisatta sat down in a nice place, undid his parcel, and began to eat. This time he did not offer the other a share. The young gentleman was tired with walking all day, and hungry to the bottom of his soul; there he stood, looking on, and thinking: “If he offers me any, I’ll take it.” But the other ate away without a word. “This low fellow,” thought the young man, “eats every scrap without a word. Well, I’ll beg a piece; I can throw away the outside, which is defiled, and eat the rest.” And so he did; he ate what was left. As soon as he had eaten, he thought: “How I have disgraced my birth, my clan, my family! Why, I have eaten the leavings of a low born churl!” Keen indeed was his remorse; he threw up the food, and blood came with it. “Oh, what a wicked deed I have done,” he wept, “all for the sake of a trifle!” and he went on in the words of the first verse:
1. “What a trifle! And his leavings! Given too against his will!
And I am a highborn brahmin! And the stuff has made me ill!”
Thus did the young gentleman make his lamentation; adding, “Why did I do such a wicked thing just for life’s sake?” He plunged into the jungle, and never let any eye see him again, but there he died forlorn.
When this story was ended, the Teacher repeated, “Just as the young brahmin, monks, after eating the leavings of a Caṇḍāla, found that neither laughter nor joy was for him, because he had taken improper food; so whosoever has embraced this dispensation, and gains a livelihood by unlawful means, when he eats the food and supports his life in any way that is blamed and disapproved by the Buddha, will find that there is no laughter and no joy for him.” Then, after Fully Awakening, he repeated the second verse:
2. “He that lives by being wicked, who cares not if he does wrong,
Like the brahmin in the story, has no joy of what he wins.”
When this discourse was concluded, the Teacher declared the Truths and identified the Jātaka, at the conclusion of the Truths many monks entered upon the Paths and the Fruit thereof, saying: “At the time of the story I was the low-caste man.”
last updated: November 2021